Submit
An AI-generated or AI-assisted output is submitted with its intended use.
In development · AI assurance
A human review layer for AI-generated and AI-assisted work.
Objective
Attested by Humans explores a simple question: when AI produces useful work, how do we make meaningful human scrutiny visible?
The initiative focuses on defined review scopes, explicit criteria, traceable issues and reviewer judgment rather than trying to prove whether something was created by AI.
Core principle
It means a human reviewed a defined output against stated criteria and recorded an assessment.
The attestation should state what was reviewed, what criteria were applied, what limitations remain, and what judgment was reached. It does not imply authorship, infallibility or blanket certification beyond that scope.
Review dimensions
The framework is intended to stay explicit and inspectable rather than collapse everything into a single opaque score.
Are factual claims correct and appropriately qualified?
Are claims supported by credible and traceable sources?
Do assumptions, logic and conclusions hold together?
Are material gaps or missing perspectives visible?
Are uncertainty, limitations and AI involvement clear?
Is the output suitable for the decision or use intended?
Concept flow
The current direction is deliberately simple.
An AI-generated or AI-assisted output is submitted with its intended use.
A human examines the output against a declared set of criteria.
Scores where useful, issues, uncertainty and recommendations are documented.
The result becomes a visible record of what was checked and by whom.
Direction
Initial work focuses on review methods, attestation formats and early pilots. Later versions may support persistent attestation IDs, reviewer identity, machine-verifiable records and domain-specific review methods.